- Published on
Distributed Systems
- Authors
- Name
- Amit Bisht
Introduction
Distributed systems power nearly every modern application that requires scale
, fault tolerance
, and global reach
— from cloud databases to streaming platforms to container orchestration frameworks. Yet, despite their ubiquity, building reliable and performant distributed systems remains one of the most challenging engineering endeavors.

- What is it?
- Examples of Distributed Systems in Production
- Why Do We Need them ?
- Core Challenges & possible solutions
What is it?
A distributed system consists of a set of independent computational entities (called nodes or processes), running on physically separate machines, that coordinate their actions by exchanging messages over a network, to achieve a common goal.
Key properties:
Concurrency: Multiple nodes operate concurrently.
No shared memory: Communication happens solely via message passing.
Lack of a global clock: Nodes have independent clocks, which may not be synchronized.
Independent failures: Nodes and communication links can fail independently.
Distributed systems abstract away the physical distribution so users see the system as a single cohesive service or application.
Examples of Distributed Systems in Production
System | Architecture | Use Case & Description |
---|---|---|
Kubernetes | Control plane + worker nodes | Orchestrates containers across clusters with fault tolerance. |
Google Search | Sharded + replicated indexes | Large-scale web crawling, indexing, and query serving. |
Apache Kafka | Distributed log-based messaging | High-throughput, fault-tolerant event streaming system. |
Amazon DynamoDB | AP distributed NoSQL database | Highly available, partition-tolerant key-value store. |
Netflix | Microservices + CDN | Globally distributed video streaming and recommendation engine. |
Why Do We Need them ?
Scalability: Scale horizontally by adding more machines to handle increased load.
Fault Tolerance: Redundancy enables the system to keep running despite individual node failures.
Geographical Distribution: Serve global users with low latency by placing nodes closer to users.
Modularity & Isolation: Separate services into independently deployable components (microservices).
Core Challenges & possible solutions
1. Unreliable Networks
Problem: Networks are prone to message loss, delay, duplication, and out-of-order delivery.

Solution Approaches:
Idempotency: Design operations so that retrying them multiple times has no adverse effects. For example, use unique request IDs to deduplicate.
Retries with Exponential Backoff: Retry failed requests with increasing delays to avoid overwhelming the network.
Circuit Breakers: Detect repeated failures and temporarily stop sending requests to a failing service to prevent cascading failures.
Reliable Messaging Protocols: Use TCP for ordered delivery, or implement acknowledgment/retransmission at the application level.
Message Queues: Systems like Kafka or RabbitMQ buffer messages reliably, decoupling producers and consumers.
2. Partial Failures
Problem: Some nodes or network links fail, while others remain operational, making it difficult to detect failure or maintain availability.
Solution Approaches:
Failure Detection Algorithms: Use
heartbeat protocols
orgossip protocols
to monitor node health and detect failures quickly.Replication: Keep multiple copies of data or services so other nodes can take over if one fails.
Timeouts and Fallbacks: Use timeouts to detect unresponsive services and fallbacks or degrade functionality gracefully.
Quorum-based Writes/Reads: Require majority (quorum) confirmation to ensure data durability despite some node failures.
3. CAP Theorem Trade-offs
Problem: During network partitions, you must choose between consistency and availability.

Solution Approaches:
Choose Based on Use Case:
For critical data consistency (e.g., bank transactions), favor
CP systems
.For high availability with eventual consistency (e.g., social feeds), favor
AP systems
.
Use Consensus Algorithms for CP Systems:
- Algorithms like
Raft
orPaxos
coordinate nodes to agree on the order of operations.
- Algorithms like
Eventual Consistency Patterns:
- Implement conflict resolution with
CRDTs
or application-level reconciliation.
- Implement conflict resolution with
Hybrid Approaches:
- Use
tunable consistency
settings (e.g., Cassandra’s consistency levels) to balance C and A dynamically.
- Use
4. Data Consistency Models
Problem: Strong consistency is costly and often unavailable in distributed environments.
Solution Approaches:
Choose the Right Model:
Strong consistency for coordination and leader election (ZooKeeper, etcd).
Eventual consistency for high throughput, scale, and availability.
Conflict Resolution:
Use
vector clocks
orversion vectors
to detect conflicting updates.Employ
CRDTs
(Conflict-free Replicated Data Types) to merge concurrent updates automatically.
Session Guarantees:
- Ensure that clients read their own writes (session consistency) when needed.
5. Clock Synchronization and Ordering
Problem: Distributed nodes have unsynchronized clocks, complicating event ordering.
Solution Approaches:
Logical Clocks:
Use
Lamport timestamps
to impose a partial order on events.Use
vector clocks
to track causal relationships.
Physical Clock Sync:
- Synchronize clocks periodically with NTP/PTP to reduce drift, while understanding it’s not perfect.
Event Ordering Algorithms:
- Use consensus and sequencing protocols (e.g., Raft log replication) to serialize events.
6. Consensus
Problem: Agreeing on shared state or leader election in unreliable environments is complex.
Solution Approaches:
Use well-studied consensus protocols:
Raft: Easier to understand and implement, widely adopted (etcd, Consul).
Paxos: More theoretical but used in Google’s Chubby.
Zab: Used in ZooKeeper, optimized for leader-follower patterns.
Design for quorum to tolerate failures.
Minimize consensus scope to only what needs strong coordination to reduce overhead.
7. Debugging and Observability
Problem: Bugs span services, are non-deterministic, and logs are scattered.

Solution Approaches:
Distributed Tracing: Use
OpenTelemetry
,Jaeger
, orZipkin
to trace requests across services.Centralized Logging: Aggregate logs with
ELK (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana)
or similar.Metrics and Alerts: Use
Prometheus
andGrafana
to monitor system health.Correlation IDs: Tag requests and logs with unique IDs to trace through components.
8. Deployment and Upgrades
Problem: Rolling out changes risks inconsistency and downtime.


Solution Approaches:
Blue/Green Deployments: Deploy new version in parallel; switch traffic after validation.
Canary Releases: Gradually expose small user segments to new versions to monitor stability.
Feature Flags: Enable/disable features dynamically without redeploying.
Backward Compatibility: Design APIs and schemas to support old and new versions simultaneously.